Detaillierte Beitrags-Information

Zurück zur Liste

Beitragstitel Epidemiologic acquisition needs direct counting of configurations to map the truly dimensional: e.g. from cortico-subcortical loops, but thalamic mast cell-driven predilection for symbolic 4D-models hampers this.
Beitragscode P19
  1. Gottfried R. S. Treviranus Praxis am UnitoblerCampus Vortragender
Präsentationsform Poster
  • 11 - Diagnostik/Klassifikation/Psychopathologie
Abstract A. Patterns generated anatomically are costly lost since they are destroyed at acquisition. Configural-Frequency-Analysis obviates this.
B. Within neo-classical dyn4TAM-phase-space three dimensions drive „appropriative waves“. They map to „orthogonally segregated“ subcortico-cortical CSTC-loops: dlPFC (only 4D-THOUGHT; Graeme Halford ), ACC („resourcing needs-for-high-D-ACTION“), and OCF (MOOD).
C. The prime motivator „Un- vs. Certainty-Orientation (Sorrentino)“ balances frontal 4D-T-modeling and parietal highD-A-psychomotricity at PVThalami.
D. Neglect of pattern is akin to UnCertainty-oriented „philosophers“, academics attracted to „4D-modeling-about-cues“, while not them, but only „CO-soldiers“ like to „grasp“ problems through highD-articulated chains dimensionally. Correlated with elation this abruptly swaps extremes in depression. „Rat philosophers“ alias „sign-trackers“ prefer „cues for effort-sparing 4D-models“ over pellets, but cancel this after a „depressiogenic“ MC-stabilizer at the thalamic PVT of ACTION-CSTC-loop (Morrow/Fitzpatrick 2017).
Method: Studies from clinical neurosciences are contrasted as to their „grasping of-patterns.“
Conclusion: The „neglect-of-patterns-issue“ is the psychobiological core of translationals crisis from genes to behavior. Dimensional variance needs to be calculated separately.